Ediblog.com
Debra Rae
Economics
of Megachurchianity
Part
1: Church Tradition, Transition, and Transformation
©2011 Debra Rae
“Old
timers” remember with fondness the community church of yesteryear, when both
the church and grammar school operated out of a single building, likewise used
as a gathering place for town meetings. Portraying the spiritual life of simple
folks in Walnut Grove, Minnesota, the “Little House” television series
featured this homey sort of central gathering place for worship, fellowship,
instruction in the Word of God, and inspiration.
Relevant biblical and extra-biblical documents suggest that, in
the early decades of the church, non-apostolic Jewish Christians brought
biblical faith in Christ to Rome. Following Claudius’s edict against the Jews,
the church was forced to reorganize, but nonetheless maintained its common
identity and Christ-centric mission.
In
many ways, the late 1800s church in Walnut Grove, Minnesota mirrored the
Gentile-dominated “house churches” that
congregated in small groups around the city of Rome. As with the early
church, quality (not quantity) mattered most; and Christ was preeminent.
Within
that dynamic, the Rev. Robert Alden served his community as a caring shepherd,
one who maintained meaningful personal relationships with his flock including,
but not limited to, the Ingalls family, “Doc” Baker, and Nels Olesen. Times
change, and so do churches—sometimes for the good, sometimes not.
Tradition
via Verbal Plenary[i]
Traditional
Christian belief is unwavering when it comes to absolute truths in the Bible.
Fundamentalists believe the Word of God to be unchangeable and fully
inspired—i.e., “God-breathed”—as it originally was penned in Hebrew,
Chaldean, Greek, and Aramaic.
The
Greek word in the Bible translated “church” (ekklesia)
means “called out ones.” It references those who separate themselves from
“the unclean thing”—physically, socially, ethically, morally, and
spiritually. In distinguishing sacred from profane, these set their faces
as flint in unshakable adherence to truth. By the grace of God, they live
accordingly.[ii]
In obedience to the Great Commission,
faithful followers of Christ spread the good news (“Gospel”) near and far.[iii]
Naturally, doing so is likely to set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.[iv] That’s to be expected. However, for Church Growth Movement (CGM) statisticians, dogmatism and intolerance simply won’t do. Theirs is a numbers game, not to be jeopardized by introducing even a hint of divisiveness. Instead, many serve up a watered-down, conciliatory Gospel that bears little resemblance to traditional Christianity.[v]
Transition
via Diaprax
Unlike dogmatic fundamentalists, whose ways are unacceptably narrow, enlightened churchgoers extol the broader way of tolerance by welcoming all people of faith, even if that faith is godless secular humanism, Islam, or Buddhism. Unlike the early church that unashamedly proclaimed the full Gospel to the Jew first, then the Gentile, church growth gurus repeatedly practice a carefully structured methodology of Hegelian dialectic, called diaprax.[vi]
Under guidance of a trained facilitator, willing participants engage in open interchange. Nonetheless, by using group dynamics (better known as “peer pressure”), dialogue is resolutely steered to reach a pre-determined outcome—i.e., consensus—with which all feel comfortable.[vii]
In so many words, a provocative question is posed: “Hath God said?” The carefully crafted tone for this query suggests need for a second, more inclusive look. One that will unite, not divide. Accordingly, fear of alienation from the group prevents one from standing firm for his convictions. It becomes easier to rationalize that maybe God didn’t really mean what He said. It’s certainly more reasonable to be inclusive than exclusive, right?[viii]
In
this manner (thesis-antithesis-synthesis)—by means of Hegelian
dialectic—“line upon line, precept upon precept” Bible study[ix]
is forfeited for groupthink, or collaboration. Agreement or consensus, more
accurately termed compromise, prevails.
Nevertheless, unlike politically correct modernists, Christ spoke “fighin’ words” certain to stir the pot. Indeed, He characterized Pharisees as “a brood of vipers” and “white-washed tombs.” Himself a stone of stumbling and rock of offense, Christ was all about truth. His was no conciliatory Gospel.[x]
Transformation
via Collaboration
Under
guidance of management theory and practice, the American church over time has
become super sized. This trend, of course, is consistent with Western culture;
but then bigger is not always better.
As
previously suggested, not biblical tradition, but diaprax guides transformation
within the institutional church, well marinated in postmodern thought.[xi]Today’s
nonprofit (third) sector—i.e., the mega church—follows private and
government sectors in implementing slick marketing ploys, public-private
partnerships,[xii]
and faith-based initiatives[xiii]
designed to ensure social justice.[xiv]
Not
so much a shepherd, the senior pastor is best described as CEO of the
corporation. While not its primary goal, profit is recognized as essential for a
church’s continued existence. With this in view, deacons serve more as
statisticians than stewards, and elders function more as board members than
spiritual overseers. Congregants are relegated to the status of “human
resources,” prepared and then freed to perform “for the common good.”[xv]
Offshoots
of a mother church are “plant communities” where individuals’ social needs
can be met, and healthy communities can be fostered. They’re “chips off the
old block” accountable more to an official hierarchy than to the inspired Word
of God revealed under guidance of the Holy Spirit.
Unfortunately,
many of today’s mega-churches bear little resemblance to “the little brown
church in the vale” that was built in 1864 as a striking testament to
traditional Christian faith. In its place are big business ventures that pool
community resources to execute social programs. While social programs aren’t
inherently bad, man-initiated programs too often dilute biblical Christology and
divert called-out ones from their appointed mission.[xvi]
More
to come in Part 2.
1 Verbal Plenary is the biblical position that, as written in its original
language, all the Bible is fully “God-breathed”—that is, divinely
inspired—to the slightest stroke of the smallest alphabet letter.
[ii]
Isaiah 50:7—And the Lord Jehovah giveth help to me; therefore, I have not been
ashamed. Therefore, I have set my face as a flint, and I know that I am not
ashamed (Young’s Literal Translation).
[iii]
The Great Commission—The
last recorded personal instruction given by Jesus to His disciples, the
Great Commission is
one of the most significant passages in the Holy Bible. In
it, Jesus called all His followers to take specific action while on earth: "All
authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make
disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and
of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that
I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the
age" (Matthew 28:18-20).
[v]
Church Growth Movement (CGM)—A movement within evangelical
Christianity that
emphasizes missionary
work in
combination with sociological awareness of a targeted population. Its
popular label, "seeker
sensitive," distinguishes would-be converts as
"seekers."
6 George Hegel was a German philosopher who undermined the notion of fixed rights or wrongs; in fact, he believed that the State itself is god. Hegelian Dialectic (conflict resolution or the Delphi Technique) is group consensus under peer pressure whereby ends justify the means.
[vii]
Consensus (agreement) involves collective thinking that prods participants
beyond moral absolutism into the ambiguous realm of “evolving truth.”
Ground rules for collaboration forbid adversarial processes; instead,
participants must find common ground. Collaboration in the name of education
reflects leadership of change agents more so than scholarly efforts of
individuals who study to show themselves approved of God.
[viii]
Genesis 3:1.
[ix]
Isaiah 28:10.
[x]
Matthew 10:34; 23:27, 33; 1 Peter 2:8.
[xi]
Postmodernism—A
philosophical movement that questions the grand meta-narrative (big story)
as it relates to the God of the Bible, His expressed will and ways. Apparent
realities are but social constructs, subject to change.
[xii]
Public-Private Partnerships pair government service with private business
ventures—i.e., the corporate church. Funding and operations require
compliance with government regulations and restrictions. While Christians
render unto Caesar his rightful due, they nonetheless give precedence to the
Higher Authority—obeying God, rather than man.
[xiii]
Faith-based Initiatives spring from compassionate conservatism, a carefully
considered philosophy with results-driven, cost-effective, full-fledged
programs that, along with government, embrace efforts by religious groups to
address social problems associated with poverty, housing, and prisoners.
Faith-based initiatives require recipients to examine the way they live.
Because government-sponsored programs make no such demand, increased
dependency ensues. Too often, however, the slothful become “brother to him
that is a great waster” (Proverbs 18:9).
[xiv]
Social Justice
evangelicals lobby for non-proliferation, world peace, and conflict
resolution for families. They defend racial justice (if not equality),
building interfaith relations with Muslims (reciprocity optional),
International Law (trumping our US
Constitution), and justice for God’s creation (warranting human
apology—even worship).
[xvi] Biblical Christology is derived from two Greek words, meaning “the study of the person of Christ,” His deity and humanity.
More to
follow, Part 2.
[1]
Rajaa Alsanea. Girls
of Riyadh. (London: Penguin Books, 2005).
[2]
Sharia is the restrictive
code of laws and rules that govern the life and behavior of Muslims.
Based on the Qur’an and Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad, sharia
references “a path or way to a water hole in the desert.”
[3]
David Wallechinsky. “The10 Worst Living Dictators.” Parade
Magazine (February 16, 2003): 4.
[4]
Abiyas are black
“tents” (modesty coverings) worn by Gulf State Muslim women
while in public. Abiyas do
not replace, but rather overlay “street clothes” (deemed
appropriate only in privacy).
[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_antisemitism.
[6]
Quran (2:191-193).
7
Without doubt Islam is the largest non-Christian religion in the
world, and some fifteen percent of all of the world’s 1.3 billion
Muslims sympathize with extremism. Spokesperson for the military
wing of Hamas in Gaza admits: “Our
people love death.” Furthermore, he adds, “Our goal is to die
for the sake of God; and if we live, we want to humiliate Jews and
trample on their necks.”
Debra Rae is an author and educator who has traveled extensively
throughout the United States and abroad. Having authored two books—the
ABCs of Globalism and ABCs of Cultural-Isms (the latter highlighted at
the 55th Annual CBA International Convention, 2004)—Debra contributing
columnist for News With Views. Debra has been a speaker on numerous
radio shows aired across the nation, the Western Hemisphere, Russia, and
the Middle East. This past year, she co-launched and now co-hosts
WOMANTalk, a special edition of Changing Worldviews TALK Radio, for
which she writes weekly commentaries. www.debraraebooks.com,
www.womantalk.us, www.newswithviews.com/Rae/Debra.htm